SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

 

Cover Page

 

School Name:  _Franklin County Middle School                                                                             School System:  _Franklin County

                

Name of Principal:  _Lucy Floyd___                                                                                       School Year:  _ 2007-2008
                                        

Title I:  School-Wide Program:  __X______        Targeted Assistance:  ________

 

Needs Improvement Status:         Status:    NI        NI-AYP        Year:     0          1          2          3          4          5            6          7


Sanctions Implementing (Select all that apply):

 

_____X___  School Improvement Plan (School Improvement Plans will be submitted to the LEA per system guidelines.  Needs Improvement schools will submit plans to the LEA for approval in October 2006.)

 

_____X___  School Choice

 

_____X___  Supplemental Services

 

__________ Corrective Action (The Corrective Action Addendum will be submitted to the LEA along with the School Improvement    Plan in October 2006.)

 

_____X___  Restructuring (LEA approved School Improvement Plans with the Restructuring Addendums will be submitted to the Georgia Department of Education by January 31, 2007.)

 

Principal’s Signature:  __________________________________              Date: ________________________

 

Title I Director’s Signature: _____________________________               Date: ________________________

 

Page  of

 
Superintendent’s Signature: _____________________________               Date: ________________________


School Improvement Plan

2007-2009

 

System and School Name:  ________Franklin County  Middle School________________  School Year: 2007-2008

 

Measurable Goals:

  • Assessment
  • Curriculum
  • Instruction

Annual Measurable Objective:

     Goal 1:  Students passing the CRCT Reading & Language Arts test will increase from 87.5% to 90.5% for All Students, will increase from 72.2% to 75.2% for

     Black Students, will increase 41.7% to 45% for SWD and increase from 82% to 85% in Econ. Disadvantaged Students.

              Specific Academic Areas within Content (Domains, Grades to target, Subgroups)

               

Grade

Target Domains for    Reading

Target Domains for English/LA

6th grade

Literary Comprehension

Grammar & Sentence Construction

7th grade

Functional & Media Literacy

Grammar & Sentence Construction

8th grade

Literary Comprehension

Research & Writing

 

Goal 2:  Students passing the CRCT Math test will increase from 67.9% to 70% for All Students, will increase from 41.5% to 63% for Black Students, will increase from 72.2% to  75% for White Students, will increase from 13.3% to 23.3% for SWD and increase from 55.1% to 60% for Econ. Disadvantaged Students.

               Specific Academic Areas within Content (Domains, Grades to target, Subgroups)

Grade

Target Domains for Math

6th grade

Patterns & Relationships

7th grade

Algebra

8th grade

Numbers and Operations

 

 

Goal 3:  Close achievement gap between All Students and SWD, and All Students and Black Students by 5% in all content areas.

 

 

   

Goal 4:  Process Goal:  Professional Learning:  Enhance PLC’s to increase collaboration (unit planning, reviewing student work, creating common assessments, etc.) and move from Operational to Fully Operational on the School Keys rubric.

 

 

 

 

GSS Strands

 

 

Actions, Strategies and Interventions

 

 

Timeline

 

Estimated Costs, Funding Sources and Resources

 

Person’s Responsible

Means of Evaluation

 

  Artifacts       Evidence of Impact on Student

                                             Learning

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessment

 

Professional

Learning

 

Leadership

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessment

 

Professional

Learning

 

Leadership

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goal 1: 

The school’s curriculum will be sequenced and organized to ensure teachers and students know, do and understand the core content as outlined in GPS or QCC (based on phase-in plan) NCLB 2,3,4,9

 

a)        The overall curriculum will be carefully and fully aligned with horizontal elements supporting the GPS and vertical elements preparing students for growing levels of standards mastery that requires depth of understanding and rigor.

 

b)        Teachers will engage in a process of collaborative planning to ensure they agree on core content and required student performance.

 

 

c)        Monitoring by administrators and teacher leaders will use performance data and the review of student work to revise curriculum implementation and alignment of resources.

 

d)        Continued revision of existing pacing guides to align with GPS to meet the needs of struggling learners.

 

 

e)        Teachers will work collaboratively within departments to create, publish and revise unit plans that align with GPS in math, reading and ELA.  SWD teachers will plan with regular education teachers to provide continuity and consistency.

 

 

 

Goal 2: 

Collect and analyze student performance data to identify patterns of achievement and underachievement in order to design and implement appropriate instructional interventions

 NCLB 1,2,4,5,

a)        Balanced Assessments will be used to monitor student progress in math and reading.

 

1.        Fully implement TestGate @ assessment tool in all grade levels to track student achievement.

                                                                      NCLB 1

2.        Create diagnostic reports through the use of Classworks @ to provide an instructional plan for individual students in math and reading.

                                                                  NCLB 2, 5

3.        Hard copies of Coach @, CRCT will continue be used in reading, math and science and will be implemented in math to guide teachers in developing test assessments to ensure rigor in test design.

                                                                  NCLB 1, 4

                            4.     Continue Study Island@

                                    as a remediation/

           acceleration/progress                             monitoring tool for high impact students as well as students at risk in all grades for math and reading.

                                                     NCLB 1, 9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On going

2007-2009

 

 

 

 

 

On going

2007-2009

 

 

 

 

On going

2007-2009

 

 

 

 

On going

2007-2009

 

 

 

Weekly

2007-2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarterly

2007-2009

 

 

Quarterly

2007-2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

On-going

2007-2009

 

 

 

 

 

On-going

2007-2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$17,000

Title I, Title I SI Grant, Middle Grades State funds

 

 

$18,000 Title I, Title I SI grant, Middle Grades State funds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$20,000 (final payment)

SI Grant

 

 

 

 

 

 

$3,500 SI Grant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Principal, Teachers, Technology Specialist, Math Coach

 

 

 

Teachers

 

 

 

 

 

Administrative Team

 

 

 

 

 

 

Teachers, Administrators, LF

 

 

Teachers, administrators

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Principal, Teachers Technology Specialist   

Graduation Coach

 

 

 

Teachers

 

 

 

 

 

Administrative

Team

 

 

 

 

 

 

Teachers

Graduation Coach

Administrators

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Curriculum maps, curriculum units, curriculum planning, unit development, sign-in sheets from professional learning to build quality units.

 

 

Curriculum maps

List of aligned resources

 

 

 

Pacing guides

 

 

 

Unit plans

Meeting minutes

Schedule of planning days

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Student portfolios, pre/post test reports, sign-ins for teacher training.

 

Individual and class reports

 

 

 

Individual and class reports

 

 

 

 

 

Individual and class reports

Individual

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Teachers can explain the language used in the standards and the performance actions that will be required by students.  Teachers can discuss vertical differences in standard within a content area.

 

Student’s assignments reflect collaborative planning among content teachers.

 

School leaders and teachers can articulate a common definition of what rigor, relevance and standards-based teaching and learning entails.

 

Teachers, support staff and administrators know the purpose of curriculum maps and units and the categories of information the documents should contain.

 

 

 

 

Teachers in link content areas understand and consistently use a common design for unit development.  Performance tasks aligned to standards and other assessments are included within the units.  The expectations of mastery of the standards within a subject or grade level are consistent in all classrooms.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ongoing assessment becomes institutionalized or a means to measure student progress.  On going assessments will allow for planning for instruction.  Teacher will be able to articulate what their students know and understand and adjust lesson plans according to student needs.

 

 

 

 

b)       Provide professional learning for all teachers on the disaggregation of CRCT data to identify and target specific students struggling in math and reading.

1) All teachers will describe and explain the standards for which their students are responsible.

2) Instruction will be adjusted upon assessment data to improve overall and individual student achievement and address all learning gaps.

3) Select mathematic teachers and reading/ELA teachers who effectively support struggling students and provide professional learning opportunities on teaching conceptual mathematics, establishing a delivery model and developing benchmarks to gauge student progress

4) Consultant will be secured to work specifically with math co-teaching classes to ensure rigor by review IEP’s, class schedules and instructional methods.

                                                                      NCLB 5

 

c)        Assessment and evaluation data are analyzed to plan for continuous improvement for each student, subgroup of students and the school as a whole.

1)  Identify students who scored “Did Not Meet” in mathematics and reading/

ELA for two consecutive years or were more than 15 points below or above the cut score.

2)  Secure a graduation coach to assist and brochure services for struggling learners.

3) Inventory resources and determine needed supplemental materials (manipulatives, calculators, laptops, In Focus machines, SMART boards, etc)

 

 

 

 

On going

July 2007-2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On going

2007-2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$48,000 State/Local Funds

 
 


On-going

2007-2009                   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$23,000 SI Grant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Teachers

Graduation Coach

Administrators

Consultants for Co-teaching

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anderson & Ward Consulting Services

 

 

 

 

 

Teachers

Graduation Coach

Administrators

 

 

 

 

 

 

Graduation Coach

 

API

 

Professional learning calendar

Individual and grade level assessment data

 

Training session agenda for struggling math

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

List of bubble students

List of high impact students

 

 

 

 

 

 

Job description for graduation coach.

 

Inventory list of resources per content area.

 

Teachers can articulate their grade level and classroom areas of focus and can describe their instructional goals for meeting individual student academic needs.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Teachers can identify individual and class strengths, misconceptions and areas of weakness.

 

Teachers can explain how instruction has been designed to meet student needs based on the diagnostic assessment.

Instruction

Professional Learning

Goal 3:  The School Culture reflects norms, values, standards and practices that reinforce the academic, social, emotional and relational growth of each student.

 

a)       Research based instruction will be standard practice.

 

1)       Higher-order thinking skills will be emphasized for student learning.  

                

2)       Instructional flexible grouping     practices will be based on diagnosis and formative assessments to address subgroup needs in math and reading.

 

3)       New textbooks will be adopted for science using a research based crosswalk method for selection.

 

4)        CRCT coach software and workbooks in reading, math, language arts and science will be used to enhance instruction

 

5)       Technology will be integrated into math and reading classrooms to enhance instruction:  SMART boards, laptop computers, and in focus machines.

 

b)       The context of professional learning—the who, why, when and where, contribute to the development and quality of learning communities ensuring that they are functioning, leadership is skillful and focused on continuous improvement and resources have been allocated to support adult learning and collaboration.

 

1)        Teachers will observe each other’s classrooms and provide feedback about classroom practices.

 

2)       Opportunities are provided for beginning teaches to work with more experienced teachers to identify student learning goals, utilize research-based instructional strategies, create formative assessment and receive feedback on their performances.

 

 

3)       Consultant will be used to work with teachers new to the school through a mentor program to provide support, and instruction on best practices.

 

 

 

 

c) Parental involvement coordinator will be provided to work weekly with teachers and parents to coordinate community-based workshop and needed volunteer work in the school setting.

 

1)       Portfolio Day will engage more parent involvement in their child’s learning process.

2)       Initiate community visits to promote relationships with the school by distributing information on CRCT testing, school events, etc.

 

Goal 4:  Teachers and Administrators will hold all students to the same standards, but provide support through differentiated instruction.  Systems of support or pyramids of interventions will be established to meet student learning needs.

a)        Standards Based Classrooms will be the structure used for tier one interventions for all students.

 

b)        Math interventions class will be provided for all students to focus on critical thinking skills.

 

c)        Professional learning will be provided to ensure a better understanding of SWD categories of disabilities and how to modify instruction

 

d)        Preference seating will be given to students who are disabled.

 

e)        Tier two interventions will include external interventions that will provide additional assistance from a variety of sources to master GPS and address learning needs

1)       High impact and bubble students will be given first seats in support classes and interventions.

 

2)        Extended electronic interventions for struggling learners will be used through ClassWorks©, My Skills Tutor© and other web-based programs. 

 

3)        Interventions will be data monitored by graduation coach.

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On-going

2007-2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On-going

2007-2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On-going

2007-2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$3500 SI Grant

 

 

 

 

$10,000 SI Grant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$6,000 SI Grant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$2600 General School Funds/Title I Parental Involvement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Teachers

Administrators

Graduation Coach

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Textbook committee

 

 

 

Teachers

 

 

 

 

 

Technology Specialist

Teachers

API

 

Teachers

Consultants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Parent Involvement Coordinator

Teachers

Students

Graduation Coach

Administrators

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Teachers

Administrators

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unit Plans

 

 

Seating charts/group chards

 

 

 

 

 

Textbooks

List of textbook committee members

 

 

 

CRCT coach software

 

 

 

 

SMART boards

In-focus machines

Lap tops

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Log of release time

Observation logs from teachers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Log of visits from consultant with feedback

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sign-In sheets

Portfolio sample

Pictures of event

Pamphlets and kits for CRCT practice

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pyramid of interventions

 

Data Room

 

Professional Learning calendar

 

List of student management logs with interventions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

School leaders know the status of each class and are able to describe the support structures and systems that have been put in pace to ensure that all students meet or exceed standards.

 

Teachers can articulate the agreed upon knowledge, skills and understandings that all students are to meet.

 

Teachers can define rigor in the curriculum and how the work students do is assisting students in using knowledge and skills to problem solve, reason, communicate and make connections with other information.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All staff can describe the process they use for decision-making and how collaborative work is changing the culture of the school.

 

Administrators can articulate ways in which they participate as a member of a learning team within the school district and how this participation has resulted in improved practice in their school.  

 

Teachers can discuss their participation in professional learning opportunities and can describe how the new learning ahs been applied and what impact it has had on student learning.

 

 

Teachers can explain how their professional learning plan is aligned with the school’s plan.  Teachers can articulate with confidence about what they are learning and how it is being applied in the classroom.

 

Teacher turnover will decline through the impact of creating a school culture that is supportive or teachers and their work.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stakeholders will articulate the partnership between school and home.  The partnership will strengthen perceptions of school improvement initiatives to be student focused.

 

Parents participate with their children in a variety of educational activities designed to enrich student learning and help parents develop awareness of best practices.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Administrators and teachers can describe a complete intervention infrastructure  that is in place along with a system for monitoring effectiveness.

 

The entire staff will be able to articulate the process of analyzing data on the effective use of interventions and make changes as needed.

 

All students will describe how the intervention will benefit them from the systematic, data driven interventions that address learning weaknesses and provide opportunities for acceleration.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leadership,

School Culture

Goal 5:  The principal and school administrators provide leadership that reinforces a commitment to high expectations for student achievement while promoting the school as a true community of learning.

a)     The school leaders will participate in planning and implementation of professional learning opportunities by working collaboratively with teachers on GPS.

b)    The school leaders will have a plan for  roll out and monitoring the implementation of the GPS standards on a daily basis while monitoring student progress towards meeting the standards.

1)       Continue school leader focus walks to observe implementation of professional learning trainings

2)       Continue leader focus walks to observe standards and elements will be posted in classrooms with teachers and students speaking the language of the standards and referencing instruction to the standards

3)       The school leaders will visit classrooms often and talk to students about the quality of their work as it relates to standards.

c)     The school leaders will provide time for professional learning communities on a weekly basis to ensure support for teachers to share experiences and exemplar practices.  Professional Learning Communities will provide opportunity for collaboration on instructional techniques used in the classroom to support rigorous instruction.

d)    School leaders will develop with teachers, individual classroom goals of expectations through measurable goals to monitor student learning and raise standards within the classroom.

e)    The school will secure the services of a leadership facilitator provided by the state to ensure knowledge and implementation of the School Keys and 5 High Impact Strategies.

 

f)    The school council will meet consistently with school leaders and will have active staff, parent, and community/business member’s participation.

 

g)    The school leaders ensure school-wide consistent procedures and routines that focus on student safety, student learning and maximum, non-interrupted instructional time.

 

h)   The principal will work collaboratively with system personnel to skillfully allocate the budgeted resources to manage the facility with a constant focus on student learning.

 

i)     The school leadership team will effectively demonstrate the principals and practices of distributed leadership.  They will constantly monitor the implementation of the school improvement plan by frequently revisiting the plan at leadership meetings.  Action plans/next steps are developed to ensure that the plan is implemented effectively..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On-going

2007-2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Teachers

Principal

School leaders

LF

Leadership Team

 

 

 

 

 

 

Professional learning calendar

 

Data from focus walks

 

Schedule of classes visited for focus walks

 

Schedule for professional learning communities

 

Individual teacher goal statements

 

School counsel meeting and minutes

 

Procedures and routines for student safety

 

Budgets and resources for instruction

 

 

Minutes of the school leadership team

 

Time log for implementation of the SIP

 

45-60 action plans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The teachers can articulate how the school leaders model participation in collaborative team meetings.

 

Administrators and teachers can discuss their participation in professional learning opportunities; can describe how the new learning has been applied, and what impact it has had on student learning.

 

The faculty can explain results of data findings, the changes needed in the school based on the data, and what is needed to impact student learning.

 

The school leadership is aware of barriers to student achievement and can articulate a clear action plan to address/eliminate these barriers to learning through pyramids of interventions.